The Forms of Capital Source: The Eltan Burgos School of Economics.
Check our homepage for new, visually rich, fast and immersive experiences! The Concept of Symbolic Interactionism in Sociology Explained with Examples How we interact with or see people or things around us, has a big impact on our thinking. Symbolic interactionism is one such theory that explains your whole thought process in making you the person you are.
Let us see these concept in detail, its assumptions and its appropriate examples. ScienceStruck Staff Last Updated: American philosophers George Herbert Mead and Charles Horton Cooley are the two theorists who founded the theory of symbolic interactionism.
Mead was known to be the one true founder of this theory because of his influential and powerful work. He had written several articles and book reviews on psychology and philosophy, but could never publish a book of his own.
After his Symbolic interactionsim, many of his students gathered all his work and lecture notes, and edited four volumes of his psychology course at the University of Chicago. Symbolic Interactionism Symbolic interactionism is a theory that suggests the dependency of behavior of man on his social interactions and surroundings.
John talks to you about Anna. The information you receive from John, is what makes your initial perception about Anna. Your thinking has been molded according to that of John.
After you meet Anna, you realize that she is different from what you thought about her, based on the descriptions given by John. This changes your behavior towards Anna.
Assumptions We live in a world built up with social concrete. All our actions come from what we are thinking, and thinking is highly influenced by the way we perceive things either visually or by interacting with people or things around us.
Herbert Blumer, a student of George Herbert Mead, set out three assumptions for the symbolic interactionism theory. Our minds create meanings of things by the way it perceives them, and acts towards them accordingly.
These meanings are formed as a result of social interaction with things, people, and the society. Our thought process is based on interpreting these meanings that our minds have created for us.
He speaks of the difference between "I" and "me". Every person thinks of us differently. We understand how they define us in their minds, and to live to their definitions, we create a "me". You just met a person.
You know little about him. Likewise, he knows little about you. You will not reveal your whole self to him for the first few meetings, or till the time you have become comfortable with him.
When you are at home with your elders, you know what they expect of you, how they have seen you since childhood, and how they think of you. You will be cautious of the language you use, the topics you choose to talk about, and your actions and body language will accordingly change.
Meanings of Things Meanings of things not just come from what we read or what we listen to, or from what we perceive. It comes from what we understand of it.
Understanding comes from the way we perceive things our mind tells us to. Different people perceive differently. The meanings in their minds about things are stored differently than yours.
The surroundings you have been around, the group of people you have been with, have understood the same things in a different manner, and when they interact with you, they pass on their thinking to you.
This is how you create meanings of your own, understand them according to the meanings already stored in your mind, and implement it differently. Love can be defined differently, can be spoken of differently, perceived differently, and come into action differently.
Ask a child what love is, he will speak of God or his family that loves him. From where has he received this knowledge? From his surroundings and experiences.
These experiences are based on what he perceived from his interaction with people. His knowledge is limited, and so he speaks of what he knows from the meaning he has created in his mind about love.
If you ask a grownup what love is, he will define it differently. His knowledge has expanded on the basis of his relationship with the people he has interacted with.Symbolic interactionism is a sociological theory that develops from practical considerations and alludes to people's particular utilization of dialect to make images and normal implications, for deduction and correspondence with others.
In other words, it is a frame of reference to better understand how individuals interact with one another to create symbolic worlds, and in return, how these.
The field of sociology itself–and sociological theory by extension–is relatively new. Both date back to the 18th and 19th centuries. The drastic social changes of that period, such as industrialization, urbanization, and the rise of democratic states caused particularly Western thinkers to become aware of society.
The oldest sociological theories deal with broad historical processes. Symbolic interactionism is a school of thought in sociology that explains social behavior in terms of how people interact with each other via symbols; in this view, social structures are best understood in terms of such individual interactions.
Sociological Paradigm #3: Symbolic Interactionist Theory. Symbolic interactionism is a micro-level theory that focuses on the relationships among individuals within a society. Communication—the exchange of meaning through language and symbols—is believed to be the way in which people make sense of their social worlds.
Symbolic interactionism is a theory that suggests the dependency of behavior of man on his social interactions and surroundings.
Humans tend to live or do certain things on the basis of other people's thinking. Download free images from 4 Free Photos stock photo library.